Search This Blog

Showing posts with label recreational. Show all posts
Showing posts with label recreational. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Moura Industries Inc. manufactures recreational vehicles

Moura Industries Inc. manufactures recreational vehicles. Moura uses a job order cost system. The time tickets from August jobs are summarized below.

Job 410 $3,400
Job 411 1,700
Job 412 1,400
Job 413 2,500
Factory supervision 1,900

Factory overhead is applied to jobs on the basis of a predetermined overhead rate of $25 per direct labor hour. The direct labor rate is $15 per hour.

a. Journalize the entry to record the factory labor costs.
b. Journalize the entry to apply factory overhead to production for August.

Click here for the solution: Moura Industries Inc. manufactures recreational vehicles

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

In 2003, Karen Pearson and Steve and Tara Carlson agreed to buy a 2004 Dynasty recreational vehicle (RV)

11-4A. Shipment and Destination Contracts. In 2003, Karen Pearson and Steve and Tara Carlson agreed to buy a 2004 Dynasty recreational vehicle (RV) from DeMartini’s RV Sales in Grass Valley, California. On September 29, Pearson, the Carlsons, and DeMartini’s signed a contract providing that “seller agrees to deliver the vehicle to you on the date this contract is signed.” The buyers made a payment of $145,000 on the total price of $356,416 the next day, when they also signed a form acknowledging that the RV had been inspected and accepted. They agreed to return later to have the RV transported out of state for delivery (to avoid paying state sales tax on the purchase). On October 7, Steve Carlson returned to DeMartini’s to ride with the seller’s driver to Nevada to consummate the out-of –state delivery. When the RV developed problems, Pearson and the Carlsons filed a suit in a federal district court against the RV’s manufacturer, Monaco Coach Corp., alleging in part, breach of warranty under the state law. The applicable statute is expressly limited to goods sold in California. Monaco argued that this RV had been sold in Nevada. How does the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) define a sale? What does the UCC provide with respect to the passage of title? How do these provisions apply here? Discuss. [ Carlson v. Monaco Coach Corp., 486 F. Supp. 2d 1127 (E.D. Cal. 2007)]


Click here for the solution: In 2003, Karen Pearson and Steve and Tara Carlson agreed to buy a 2004 Dynasty recreational vehicle (RV)