PR 9-2A Wigs Plus Company supplies wigs and hair care products to beauty salons throughout California and the Pacific Northwest. The accounts receivable clerk for Wigs Plus prepared the following partially completed aging of receivables schedule as of the end of business on December 31, 2009:
Customer Balance Not Past Due 1-30 31-60 61-90 91-120 Over 120
Alpha Beauty 20,000 20,000
Blonde Wigs 11,000 11,000
Zahn’s Beauty 2,900 2,900
Subtotals 900,000 498,600 217,250 98,750 33,300 29,950 22,150
The following accounts were unintentionally omitted from the aging schedule:
Customer Due Date Balance
Sun Coast Beauty May 30, 2009 $ 2850
Paradise Beauty Store Sept 15, 2009 6050
Helix Hair Products Oct 17, 2009 800
Hairy’s Hair Care Oct 20, 2009 2000
Surf Images Nov 18, 2009 700
Oh The Hair Nov 29, 2009 3500
Mountain Coatings Dec 1, 2009 2250
Lasting Images Jan 9, 2010 7400
Wigs Plus has a past history of uncollectible accounts by age category, as follows:
Age Class Percent Uncollectible
Not Past Due 2%
1-30 Days past due 4
31-60 days past due 10
61-90 days past due 15
91-120 days past due 35
Over 120 days 80
Instructions:
1. Determine the number of days past due for each of the preceding accounts.
2. Complete the aging of receivables schedule
3. Estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts, based on the aging of receivables schedule.
4. Assume that the allowance for doubtful accounts for Wigs Plus has a credit balance of $1,710 before adjustment on December 31, 2009. Journalize the adjustment for uncollectible account.
Click here for the solution: Wigs Plus Company supplies wigs and hair care products to beauty salons throughout California and the Pacific Northwest
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label hair. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hair. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
Friday, September 18, 2015
Waves Galore, Inc. manufactures hair curlers and blow-dryers
Problem P4-1B, Waves Galore, Inc. manufactures hair curlers and
blow-dryers. The handheld hair curler is Waves Galore's high volume
product, 80,000 units annually. It is a "large barrel", 20-watt,
triple-heat appliance designed to appeal to the teenage market segment
with its glow-in-the-dark handle. The handheld blow-dryer is Waves
Galore's lower-volume product, 40,000 units annually. IT is a
three-speed, 2,000 watt appliance with a "cool setting" and a removable
filter. It also is designed for the teen market. Both products require 1
hour of direct labor for completion. Therefore, total annual direct
labor hours are 120,000 (80,000 + 40,000). Expected annual manufacturing
overhead is $441,600. Thus, the predetermined overhead rate is $3.65
per direct labor hour. The direct material cost per unit is $5.25 for
the hair curler and 9.75 for the blow-dryer. The direct labor cost is
$8.00 per unit for the hair curler and blow-dryer.
Waves Galore purchases most of its parts from suppliers and assembles the finished products at its Fargo, North Dakota plant. It recently adopted activity-based costing, which after year-end will totally replace its traditional direct labor-based cost accounting system. Waves Galore has identified the following six activity cost pools and related cost drivers and has assembled the following information.
Activity Cost Pool Cost Driver Estimated Overhead Expected Use of Cost Drivers Expected Use of Drivers by Product
Curlers Dryers
Purchasing Orders $57,500 500 170 330
Receiving Pounds 42,000 140,000 58,000 82,000
Assembling Parts 166,000 830,000 415,000 415,000
Testing Tests 52,000 130,000 82,000 48,000
Finishing Units 60,000 120,000 80,000 40,000
Packing and shipping Cartons 60,500 12,100 8,040 4,060 $438,000
Instructions:
(a) Under traditional product costing, compute the total unit cost of both products. Prepare a single comparative schedule of the individual costs by products, in the format provided below.
(b) Under ABC, prepare a schedule showing the computations of the activity-based overhead rates (per cost driver).
(c) Prepare a schedule assigning each activity's overhead cost pool to each product based on the use of cost drivers. (Include a computation of overhead cost per unit, rounding to the nearest cent.)
(d) Compute the total cost per unit for each product under ABC.
(e) Classify each of the activities as a value-added activity or a non-value-added activity.
(f)(1) Comment on the comparative overhead cost per unit for the two products under ABC.
(f)(2) Comment on the comparative total costs per unit under traditional costing and ABC.
Click here for the solution: Waves Galore, Inc. manufactures hair curlers and blow-dryers
Waves Galore purchases most of its parts from suppliers and assembles the finished products at its Fargo, North Dakota plant. It recently adopted activity-based costing, which after year-end will totally replace its traditional direct labor-based cost accounting system. Waves Galore has identified the following six activity cost pools and related cost drivers and has assembled the following information.
Activity Cost Pool Cost Driver Estimated Overhead Expected Use of Cost Drivers Expected Use of Drivers by Product
Curlers Dryers
Purchasing Orders $57,500 500 170 330
Receiving Pounds 42,000 140,000 58,000 82,000
Assembling Parts 166,000 830,000 415,000 415,000
Testing Tests 52,000 130,000 82,000 48,000
Finishing Units 60,000 120,000 80,000 40,000
Packing and shipping Cartons 60,500 12,100 8,040 4,060 $438,000
Instructions:
(a) Under traditional product costing, compute the total unit cost of both products. Prepare a single comparative schedule of the individual costs by products, in the format provided below.
(b) Under ABC, prepare a schedule showing the computations of the activity-based overhead rates (per cost driver).
(c) Prepare a schedule assigning each activity's overhead cost pool to each product based on the use of cost drivers. (Include a computation of overhead cost per unit, rounding to the nearest cent.)
(d) Compute the total cost per unit for each product under ABC.
(e) Classify each of the activities as a value-added activity or a non-value-added activity.
(f)(1) Comment on the comparative overhead cost per unit for the two products under ABC.
(f)(2) Comment on the comparative total costs per unit under traditional costing and ABC.
Click here for the solution: Waves Galore, Inc. manufactures hair curlers and blow-dryers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)